Truth over intimidation
Rising tension between Gen. Estomo and whistleblower Patidongan reveals troubling questions about power, accountability, and justice in the Philippine law enforcement system.
Estomo’s threat to sue Patidongan unless it issues a public apology and retracts its statements is troubling, especially in a case as sensitive as the disappearance of over 30 sabungeros.
While Estomo has every right to defend his reputation, resorting to legal intimidation risks undermining whistleblower protection and the broader search for truth.
Instead of pushing for retraction, why not support a transparent, independent investigation? If Patidongan is indeed fabricating claims, let the evidence speak for itself in a courtroom—or better, before an impartial inquiry.
Patidongan, for his part, should be held accountable if his allegations are unfounded. However, whistleblowers often expose hard truths, and dismissing them through threats sets a dangerous precedent.
Conflicting claims from Estomo and Patidongan deepen confusion, highlighting the urgent need for a thorough investigation to uncover the full truth.
In a democracy, citizens must actively seek truth, defend free expression, and reject any attempt to silence honest voices or facts.
All individuals, no matter how powerful, must submit to the law.
The real issue is truth-telling and whether authorities will act to finally deliver justice for the still-missing sabungeros and their families.
